H. Rouw Co. v. Crivella

Supreme Court

H. Rouw Co. v. Crivella

310 U.S. 612, 60 S. Ct. 1084

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 27, 1940

DocketNo. 459

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 310 U.S. 612 (H. Rouw Co. v. Crivella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

H. Rouw Co. v. Crivella, 310 U.S. 612, 60 S. Ct. 1084 (1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In the light of Public, No. [613]*613515, 76th Congress, Third Session, approved May 14,1940, and, it appearing that it was the intention of the Congress to make that Act applicable to the present case, and to other cases similarly situated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to hear the appeal from the award of the Secretary of Agriculture.

Messrs. William L. Curtis and D. H. Howell submitted for petitioner. Messrs. Harry P. Daily and John P. Wood submitted for respondent. By leave of Court, Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Robert K. McConnaughey, Mastin G. White, and Joseph 0. Parker filed a brief on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In the light of Public, No. [613]*613515, 76th Congress, Third Session, approved May 14,1940, and, it appearing that it was the intention of the Congress to make that Act applicable to the present case, and to other cases similarly situated, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to hear the appeal from the award of the Secretary of Agriculture.

Messrs. William L. Curtis and D. H. Howell submitted for petitioner. Messrs. Harry P. Daily and John P. Wood submitted for respondent. By leave of Court, Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Robert K. McConnaughey, Mastin G. White, and Joseph 0. Parker filed a brief on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 U.S. 612, 60 S. Ct. 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-rouw-co-v-crivella-scotus-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack