H. Reisman Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 764, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2636
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 24, 1968
DocketR.D. 11474; Entry No. 464252
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 764 (H. Reisman Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. Reisman Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 764, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2636 (cusc 1968).

Opinion

Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:
That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, consists of sulfamethazine, a chemical compound appraised on the basis of American selling price as defined in Section [765]*765402 (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, which basis of appraisement is not in dispute.
That the price, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at which competitive merchandise produced in the United States was freely sold for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, was $5.85 per kilo, less 1%.
That the appeal herein be submitted on this stipulation, limited to the merchandise described herein, and abandoned as to all other merchandise.

On the agreed facts, I find that American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question and that such value was $5.85 per kilo, less 1 percent.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 764, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-reisman-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.