H. Reisman Corp. v. United States

39 F.3d 1195, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37627, 1994 WL 558596
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 1994
Docket94-1165
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 F.3d 1195 (H. Reisman Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. Reisman Corp. v. United States, 39 F.3d 1195, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37627, 1994 WL 558596 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

39 F.3d 1195

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
H. REISMAN CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-1165.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1994.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED.

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant/appellant's consent motion to dismiss this appeal and to remand this action to the United States Court of International Trade, it is hereby

ORDERED that Appeal No. 94-1165 is dismissed; and it is further

ORDERED that this action is remanded to the United States Court of International Trade, to enable it to enter a Stipulated Judgment on Agreed Statement of Facts, which will be submitted by the parties to the Court of International Trade, and which provides, as an expressly contingent condition of the settlement, for the vacating of the opinion and judgment of the Court of International Trade underlying this appeal; and it is further

ORDERED that each party will bear their own costs, fees and expenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warner-Lambert Co. v. United States
341 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (Court of International Trade, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F.3d 1195, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37627, 1994 WL 558596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-reisman-corp-v-united-states-cafc-1994.