H. R. Mallinson & Co. v. Gluck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

H. R. Mallinson & Co. v. Gluck

231 A.D. 813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 813 (H. R. Mallinson & Co. v. Gluck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

H. R. Mallinson & Co. v. Gluck, 231 A.D. 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order is affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think that the question as to whether the use of the term “ Pagoda ” was an infringement of plaintiff’s right should await the trial. Present ■—■ Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ. Order affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order is affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think that the question as to whether the use of the term “ Pagoda ” was an infringement of plaintiff’s right should await the trial. Present ■—■ Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ. Order affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-r-mallinson-co-v-gluck-nyappdiv-1930.