H. R. H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

H. R. H. v. State

302 So. 2d 473, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 1974·No. No. 74-420·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, a minor, urges as error the insufficiency of the evidence to support his adjudication of delinquency because of his violation of § 877.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. (inhalation and possession of harmful chemical substances). After a careful examination of the record in the case sub judice, we conclude that there was sufficient competent evidence contained therein to sustain the court’s finding that the defendant juvenile at least had constructive possession of Transmission “GO” Fluid and further that he was in an intoxicated condition. Accordingly, the order adjudicating the appellant a delinquent child is affirmed. Cf. In Interest of P.G. and G.G., Minors, Fla.App. 1973, 280 So.2d 490.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, a minor, urges as error the insufficiency of the evidence to support his adjudication of delinquency because of his violation of § 877.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. (inhalation and possession of harmful chemical substances). After a careful examination of the record in the case sub judice, we conclude that there was sufficient competent evidence contained therein to sustain the court’s finding that the defendant juvenile at least had constructive possession of Transmission “GO” Fluid and further that he was in an intoxicated condition. Accordingly, the order adjudicating the appellant a delinquent child is affirmed. Cf. In Interest of P.G. and G.G., Minors, Fla.App. 1973, 280 So.2d 490.

Affirmed.

H. R. H. v. State, 302 So. 2d 473, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

302 So. 2d 473 (H. R. H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related