H. Lyon & Sons v. Kempinski

1 White & W. 34
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 1880
DocketNo. 1173, Op. Book No. 3, p. 429
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 34 (H. Lyon & Sons v. Kempinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. Lyon & Sons v. Kempinski, 1 White & W. 34 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

Clark, J.

§ 79. Suit upon notes; notes need not be attached to petition. Where a petition describes a note sued upon by its date, amount, time when payable, name of maker and payee, rate of interest, and indorsement to plaintiff, it is unnecessary to attach or file the note as a part of the petition; and when the petition alleges that the note is attached and filed as a part thereof, but in fact the note [35]*35was not so attached and filed, the allegation may be treated as surplusage, and the note may be read in evidence the same as if no such allegation had been made.

June 12, 1880.

§ 80. Promissory note; indorsement and delivery; proof of. A note made payable to the maker thereof, and indorsed by him in blank, can be recovered upon by the holder without proof of indorsement and delivery. The production of the note by the holder, with the indorsement thereon, prima facie entitles him to recover. [Greneaux v. Wheeler, 6 Tex. 515.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greneaux v. Wheeler
6 Tex. 515 (Texas Supreme Court, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-lyon-sons-v-kempinski-texapp-1880.