H. L. Green Co. v. Industrial Development Inc.

8 A.D.2d 785, 186 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8185
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 12, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 785 (H. L. Green Co. v. Industrial Development Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. L. Green Co. v. Industrial Development Inc., 8 A.D.2d 785, 186 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order appealed from reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the injunction vacated, and the motion for an injunction pendente lite denied, [786]*786with $10 costs. Respondent was required and failed to establish irreparable injury unless the injunction sought is granted. (Gilbert v. Burnside, 6 A D 2d 834; Hauth v. Giant Portland Cement Co., 33 Del. Ch. 496; 5 Fletcher’s Cyclopedia Corporations, § 2071.) Nor was there for the purpose of enjoining an annual meeting a sufficient showing of clear wrongdoing on the part of the management in the circulation of proxy statements and the proposed circulation of the annual report. The desirability of. additional time to enable the respondent to disseminate facts and disclosures concerning the incumbent board is insufficient basis for the relief sought. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Rabin, J., dissents and votes to affirm in a dissenting memorandum, as follows: I dissent and vote to affirm. I believe it is in the interest of all the stockholders that they receive as much information with respect to the affairs of the company as possible before the voting for directors takes place. Inasmuch as there would appear to be no prejudice to anyone by postponement of the meeting, the stay granted below would seem proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanadium Corp. of America v. Susquehanna Corporation
203 F. Supp. 686 (D. Delaware, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 785, 186 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-l-green-co-v-industrial-development-inc-nyappdiv-1959.