H. KYLE FLETCHER, ESQUIRE vs DOUGLAS ARTHUR KEEGAN
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
H. KYLE FLETCHER, ESQUIRE, Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-1845 LT Case No. 2014-CP-002772
DOUGLAS ARTHUR KEEGAN, Appellee.
________________________________/ Decision filed July 12, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Leticia J. Marques, Judge.
H. Kyle Fletcher, Jr., of Fletcher Law Firm, P.A., Oviedo, pro se.
Douglas Arthur Keegan, Sanford, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
EDWARDS, J., concurring specially. 5D21-1845 LT Case No. 2014-CP-002772
I concur in affirming the underlying order but do so without prejudice for Appellee to pursue all appropriate remedies, including against Appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
H. KYLE FLETCHER, ESQUIRE vs DOUGLAS ARTHUR KEEGAN (H. KYLE FLETCHER, ESQUIRE vs DOUGLAS ARTHUR KEEGAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.