H. K. McCann Co. v. Week
251 P. 858, 141 Wash. 702, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 979
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1927
DocketNo. 19620. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 251 P. 858 (H. K. McCann Co. v. Week) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
H. K. McCann Co. v. Week, 251 P. 858, 141 Wash. 702, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 979 (Wash. 1927).
Opinions
On Rehearing.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 139 Wash. 183, 246 Pac. 292.
Judgment reversed upon the defendant’s appeal and case remanded with directions to the superior court to dismiss the action.
Judge Parker, being absent, took no part in the hearing En Banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Ball
12 P.2d 28 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Week v. the Luthy Co.
11 P.2d 410 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
H. K. McCann Co. v. Week
1 P.2d 452 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
251 P. 858, 141 Wash. 702, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-k-mccann-co-v-week-wash-1927.