H. J. Ryan v. State of Tennessee

257 F.2d 63, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 1958
Docket13441
StatusPublished

This text of 257 F.2d 63 (H. J. Ryan v. State of Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H. J. Ryan v. State of Tennessee, 257 F.2d 63, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445 (6th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered by the Court on the record and briefs of the parties and oral argument of counsel for appellee.

It appears from the complaint that no factual situation is presented to the Court and no controversy or issue between the appellant and appellee is stated therein, and that the only prayer is that the Court make an abstract ruling with respect to the construction and effect of the 9th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Constitutional questions are not to be decided hypothetically. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. Davis, 301 U. S. 337, 353, 57 S.Ct. 816, 81 L.Ed. 1143. No justiciable issue is presented by the complaint. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 240-241, 57 S.Ct. 461, 81 L.Ed. 617.

It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court dismissing the complaint be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aetna Life Insurance v. Haworth
300 U.S. 227 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. Davis
301 U.S. 337 (Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 F.2d 63, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-j-ryan-v-state-of-tennessee-ca6-1958.