H. J. Jones v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, and U. S. Attorney General
This text of 434 F.2d 655 (H. J. Jones v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, and U. S. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The initial review of this case prompted us to inform the appellant, H. J. Jones, that we were contemplating summary affirmance on our own motion and afforded him an opportunity to submit a memorandum in opposition. See Rule 8(d), Revised Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1970). He had earlier submitted a brief addressing the underlying merits and chose not to file additional papers.
We have now carefully reviewed the files and records in this case along with the original file of the earlier district court case, No. L-202, and are thoroughly convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct. Concluding that there is no need for further argument on the unsubstantial question presented, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in 319 F.Supp. 455 (D.C.Kan., 1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 F.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-j-jones-v-r-i-moseley-warden-united-states-penitentiary-ca10-1970.