H. J. Ashe Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

H. J. Ashe Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2920

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 1968

DocketNo. P68/7; protest 67/34532 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 986 (H. J. Ashe Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

H. J. Ashe Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2920 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein the court held that the flashlights and batteries were separate entities rather than an entirety and were separately dutiable, the claim of the plantiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein the court held that the flashlights and batteries were separate entities rather than an entirety and were separately dutiable, the claim of the plantiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 986, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-j-ashe-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack