H. H. Prescott & Son v. Hollingsworth
This text of 120 So. 101 (H. H. Prescott & Son v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit for a balance due on open account, in which defendant pleaded a general denial and the prescription of three years.
On trial judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for the amount sued for and defendant appeals; but the cause was not argued and defendant has, not filed any brief and suggested any error in the ruling of the trial court.
The record shows that the account is for items charged against defendant for premiums due on insurance policies issued through plaintiff to defendant who was represented by her brother on which a payment was made and the account acknowledged on March 9, 1923, and the present suit was filed and service obtained on defendant on March 9, 1926.
The payment and acknowledgment of the account interrupted prescription, and the plea was properly overruled and judgment rendered for plaintiff (Bennett-Brewer Hardware Co. vs. Wakeman, 160 La. 407, 107 So. 206; Holmes & Co. vs. Hiller, 7 La. App. 590), and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 So. 101, 9 La. App. 231, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-h-prescott-son-v-hollingsworth-lactapp-1928.