H. H. Elder & Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 888
United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1967·No. No. P67/320·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of sewing machine motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of ACEC Electric Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 138, C.D. 2563), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. H. Elder & Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 888 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 888 (H. H. Elder & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acec Electric Corp. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 138 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)