H & F Barge Company, Inc. v. Garber Brothers, Inc. And Charles L. Garber, Individually

534 F.2d 1103, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8157
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1976
Docket74-3872
StatusPublished

This text of 534 F.2d 1103 (H & F Barge Company, Inc. v. Garber Brothers, Inc. And Charles L. Garber, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H & F Barge Company, Inc. v. Garber Brothers, Inc. And Charles L. Garber, Individually, 534 F.2d 1103, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8157 (5th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

With the following addition, the judgment below is affirmed on the basis of the opinions of the district court appearing at 71 F.R.D. 5.

The defendant contends that appointment of a magistrate as special master to determine damages was reversible error. The magistrate was not appointed pursuant to the Federal Magistrate’s Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), nor under Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(b), but explicitly under Rule 55(b)(2). The matter is not jurisdictional, nor was the question raised in the court below, thus it may not now be asserted for the first time.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H & F Barge Co. v. Garber Bros.
71 F.R.D. 5 (E.D. Louisiana, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 F.2d 1103, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-f-barge-company-inc-v-garber-brothers-inc-and-charles-l-garber-ca5-1976.