H. Ernstberger & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

H. Ernstberger & Co. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 352

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 11, 1958

DocketNo. 62282; protests 201499-K, 201741-K, and 224761-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 352 (H. Ernstberger & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

H. Ernstberger & Co. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-ernstberger-co-v-united-states-cusc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack