H. D. Williams Cooperage Co. v. Quercus Lumber Co.

204 S.W. 185, 275 Mo. 4, 1918 Mo. LEXIS 48
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 4, 1918·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BLAIR, J.

This cause was heard by the Springfield Court of Appeals. It was transferred here because one of the judges deemed the majority opinion in conflict with a decision of this court. We have reached the conclusion that the majority opinion of the Court o.f Appeals is correct. We think it properly distinguishes the decisions relied on by the dissenting judge. In accordance with the views expressed in that opinion (Williams Cooperage Co. v. Quercus Lumber Co., 187 Mo. App. 373) the 'judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. D. Williams Cooperage Co. v. Quercus Lumber Co., 204 S.W. 185, 275 Mo. 4, 1918 Mo. LEXIS 48 (Mo. 1918).

204 S.W. 185 (H. D. Williams Cooperage Co. v. Quercus Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galveston, H. & H. R. v. Sloman
244 S.W. 268 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Reynolds
233 S.W. 219 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)