H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal
46 A. 1100, 60 N.J. Eq. 483, 15 Dickinson 483, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 209
This text of 46 A. 1100 (H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal, 46 A. 1100, 60 N.J. Eq. 483, 15 Dickinson 483, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1900).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the opinion below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 A. 1100, 60 N.J. Eq. 483, 15 Dickinson 483, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-b-claflin-co-v-freudenthal-nj-1900.