H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal

46 A. 1100, 60 N.J. Eq. 483, 15 Dickinson 483, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the opinion below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal, 46 A. 1100, 60 N.J. Eq. 483, 15 Dickinson 483, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1900).

46 A. 1100 (H. B. Claflin Co. v. Freudenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.