H. Andrew Lipscomb, Karen Lipscomb, H. Andrew Lipscomb, III, D.D.S., P.C. v. NAB Asset Venture III, L.P.
This text of H. Andrew Lipscomb, Karen Lipscomb, H. Andrew Lipscomb, III, D.D.S., P.C. v. NAB Asset Venture III, L.P. (H. Andrew Lipscomb, Karen Lipscomb, H. Andrew Lipscomb, III, D.D.S., P.C. v. NAB Asset Venture III, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 18, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-95-01529-CV
H. ANDREW LIPSCOMB, KAREN LIPSCOMB, AND H. ANDREW LIPSCOMB, III, D.D.S., P.C., Appellants V. NAB ASSET VENTURE III, L.P., Appellee
On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 95-02986-D
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek We reinstate this appeal. In March 1996, we abated this case due to the
appellants’ bankruptcies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court has conducted an
independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records
(PACER) system which shows there are no pending bankruptcy cases associated
with these appellants, effectively dissolving the automatic stay.
We notified the parties by letter dated May 7, 2021, requesting they inform
the Court of the status of the bankruptcies and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution.
See id. 42.3(b), (c). To date, no party has responded.
Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this
appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c); Tenet Healthsys. Hosps. Dallas, Inc. v. N. Tex. Med.
Grp., 2021 WL 1808611, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 6, 2021, no pet. h.) (mem.
op.).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 951529F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
H. ANDREW LIPSCOMB, KAREN On Appeal from the 95th District LIPSCOMB, H. ANDREW Court, Dallas County, Texas LIPSCOMB, III, D.D.S., P.C., Trial Court Cause No. 95-02986-D. Appellants Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Schenck and No. 05-95-01529-CV V. Carlyle participating.
NAB ASSET VENTURE III, L.P., Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered June 18, 2021
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
H. Andrew Lipscomb, Karen Lipscomb, H. Andrew Lipscomb, III, D.D.S., P.C. v. NAB Asset Venture III, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-andrew-lipscomb-karen-lipscomb-h-andrew-lipscomb-iii-dds-pc-texapp-2021.