Gypsy Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n

Supreme Court

Gypsy Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n

292 U.S. 605, 54 S. Ct. 772

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 7, 1934

DocketNo. 843

StatusPublished

This text of 292 U.S. 605 (Gypsy Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gypsy Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 292 U.S. 605, 54 S. Ct. 772 (1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed upon the ground that the District Court was without jurisdiction because the requisite jurisdictional amount was not involved. Healy v. Ratta, ante, p. 263. Mr. James B. [606]*606Diggs, with whom Messrs. Russell G. Lowe, Wm. C. Liedtke, Redmond S. Cole, and C. L. Billings were on the brief, for appellant.

Messrs. C. W. King, George W. Selinger, and W. D. Humphrey were on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed upon the ground that the District Court was without jurisdiction because the requisite jurisdictional amount was not involved. Healy v. Ratta, ante, p. 263. Mr. James B. [606]*606Diggs, with whom Messrs. Russell G. Lowe, Wm. C. Liedtke, Redmond S. Cole, and C. L. Billings were on the brief, for appellant.

Messrs. C. W. King, George W. Selinger, and W. D. Humphrey were on the brief for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 U.S. 605, 54 S. Ct. 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gypsy-oil-co-v-oklahoma-tax-commn-scotus-1934.