Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transportation Corp.

4 N.E.3d 359, 22 N.Y.3d 1018
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2013·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

This action was not settled because the general release and the hold harmless agreement were never delivered to defendant, nor was the acceptance of the settlement offer otherwise communicated to defendant or its carrier (see White v Corlies, 46 NY 467, 469 [1871]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur; Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transportation Corp., 4 N.E.3d 359, 22 N.Y.3d 1018 (N.Y. 2013).

4 N.E.3d 359 (Gyabaah v. Rivlab Transportation Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 01198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Roe v. Roe
117 A.D.3d 1217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)