Gwinn v. . Parker

25 S.E. 705, 119 N.C. 19
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

EaiRcloth, C. J.:

The plaintiff, having previously filed a complaint, on Thursday, Spring Term, 1896, obtained judgment for want of an answer. On the next day the Judge, on defendants’ affidavit and application, set aside the judgment and allowed defendants 30 days to answer. Plaintiff appealed.

It has been the settled rule for some time that any order or decree made was, during the term, in fieri, and that the Court during the term could vacate or modify the same.

The Court has the discretion also, not reviewable, to extend the time for filing pleadings. Code, Sec. 274; Gilchrist v. Kitchen, 86 N. C., 20 ; Brown v. Hale, 93 N. C., 188. No Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gwinn v. . Parker, 25 S.E. 705, 119 N.C. 19 (N.C. 1896).

25 S.E. 705 (Gwinn v. . Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopkins v. Hopkins
151 S.E.2d 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
State v. . McLamb
180 S.E. 586 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Campbell v. City of Asheville
114 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Gold v. . Maxwell
90 S.E. 115 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Cook v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
64 S.E. 204 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
State v. . Chestnutt
36 S.E. 278 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
State v. Chesnutt
126 N.C. 1121 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
Mecke v. Valleytown Mineral Co.
93 F. 697 (Fourth Circuit, 1899)
Woodcock v. . Merrimon
30 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
Davison v. West Oxford Land Co.
26 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)