Gwinn v. . Parker
This text of 25 S.E. 705 (Gwinn v. . Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, having previously filed a complaint, on Thursday, Spring Term, 1896, obtained judgment for want of an answer. On the next day the Judge, on defendants’ affidavit and application, set aside the judgment and allowed defendants 30 days to answer. Plaintiff appealed.
It has been the settled rule for some time that any order or decree made was, during the term, in fieri, and that the Court during the term could vacate or modify the same.
The Court has the discretion also, not reviewable, to extend the time for filing pleadings. Code, Sec. 274; Gilchrist v. Kitchen, 86 N. C., 20 ; Brown v. Hale, 93 N. C., 188. No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 S.E. 705, 119 N.C. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gwinn-v-parker-nc-1896.