Gwin, Allen & Co. v. O'Daniel

22 S.W. 876, 85 Tex. 563, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 230
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 1893·No. No. 26.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

GAINES, Associate Justice.

We have decided the question submitted in this case in an opinion delivered at a former day of this term in the case of City of Austin v. Nalle. Upon the authority of that case we answer, that when one of the judges of the Court of Civil Appeals is disqualified, the other two members have jurisdiction, and may hear and determine the case. The fact of the disqualification need not be certified to the Governor, unless the two should be unable to agree.

Let this opinion be certified.

Delivered June 8, 1893.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gwin, Allen & Co. v. O'Daniel, 22 S.W. 876, 85 Tex. 563, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 230 (Tex. 1893).

22 S.W. 876 (Gwin, Allen & Co. v. O'Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WOOD, DAVID v. the State of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2024
San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Blair
196 S.W. 1153 (Texas Supreme Court, 1917)
San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Blair
196 S.W. 502 (Texas Supreme Court, 1917)
Long v. State
127 S.W. 551 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)