Gwendolyn M. Hanhart v. Louisiana Cvs Pharmacy LLC; Cvs Pharmacy Inc.; Cvs Health Solutions LLC
Opinion
GWENDOLYN M. HANHART * NO. 2024-C-0479
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL
LOUISIANA CVS PHARMACY * FOURTH CIRCUIT LLC; CVS PHARMACY INC.; CVS HEALTH SOLUTIONS * STATE OF LOUISIANA LLC *
* *******
SCJ JENKINS, J. CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART.
I concur with the majority’s position that the plaintiff’s petition does not
sufficiently set forth a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional
distress. However, I respectfully dissent from the dismissal of the plaintiff’s cause
of action with prejudice.
La. C.C.P. article 934 provides, in pertinent part, that “[w]hen the grounds of
the objection pleaded by the peremptory exception may be removed by amendment
of the petition, the judgment sustaining the exception shall order such amendment
within the delay allowed by the court.” See also An Erny Girl L.L.C. v. BCNO 4
L.L.C., 2018-0360, pp. 13-14 (La. App. 4 Cir. 9/26/18), 257 So.3d 212, 222-23.
Where there is a conceivable possibility an adverse party might state an action,
courts must give that party an opportunity to amend. Hamp's Constr., LLC v. 1031
Canal, LLC, 2020-0182, p. 11 (La. App. 4 Cir. 12/9/20), 312 So.3d 299, 306
(citing Alexander and Alexander, Inc., Div. of Adm., 486 So.2d 95, 100 (La.
1986)).
I would dismiss the plaintiff’s petition without prejudice and remand the
matter to the trial court to allow the plaintiff the opportunity to amend her petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gwendolyn M. Hanhart v. Louisiana Cvs Pharmacy LLC; Cvs Pharmacy Inc.; Cvs Health Solutions LLC (Gwendolyn M. Hanhart v. Louisiana Cvs Pharmacy LLC; Cvs Pharmacy Inc.; Cvs Health Solutions LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.