Gwendolyn L. Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corporation, and Robert Hoguet
This text of 993 F.2d 1537 (Gwendolyn L. Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corporation, and Robert Hoguet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
993 F.2d 1537
66 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 768
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gwendolyn L. GROOMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Robert HOGUET, Defendant.
No. 91-2752.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1993
May 17, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-88-2237-2-18)
Gwendolyn L. Grooms, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Lucinda Jenkins Haley, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, South Carolina; John Jay Myers, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
OPINION
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn L. Grooms appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant and denying her motion for reconsideration in her civil action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1985 & Supp. 1992), and various state law claims. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corp., No. CA-88-2237-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 19 and Dec. 10, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Grooms's motion for appointment of counsel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 F.2d 1537, 1993 WL 165052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gwendolyn-l-grooms-v-mobay-chemical-corporation-and-robert-hoguet-ca4-1993.