Gwathmey v. Pearce

74 N.C. 398
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Heads, J.

Where a wife conveys her separate property to secure a debt of her husband’s, the relation which she sustains to the transaction is that of surety. Purvis and wife v. Carstarphen, 73 N. C. Rep. 575.

Here the wife joined her husband in the conveyance of his land in trust to pay his debt; in which land she had, under our dower statute, a vested right to dower, to be allotted after her husband’s death; and she joined in the deed for the purpose of binding her dower. After her husband’s death the whole laud, her dower included, was sold under the trust deed to pay the debt. This made the wife a creditor of her husband’s estate, to the amount of the value of her dower in the land. That is the only point in this case. And it was rightly decided by his Honor.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Pee Curiam:. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gwathmey v. Pearce, 74 N.C. 398 (N.C. 1876).

74 N.C. 398 (Gwathmey v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Smith ex rel. Allsbrook
223 N.C. 433 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Smith v. . Smith
27 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Virginia Trust Co. v. White
2 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Barnes v. . Crawford
160 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
American Blower Co. v. MacKenzie
147 S.E. 829 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Griffin v. . Griffin
131 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Chemical Co. v. . Walston
123 S.E. 196 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Walston
187 N.C. 817 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
In re Munford
255 F. 108 (E.D. North Carolina, 1919)
Trust Co. v. . Benbow
47 S.E. 435 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)