Gwaltney v. McDade
This text of 12 F.3d 204 (Gwaltney v. McDade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William E. GWALTNEY; Edward A. Ganey, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Theodore B. Guyette, Plaintiff,
v.
Martin J. MCDADE; Lynn C. Phillips; S. Willis Adcock;
Harvey Tripp, Lieutenant; Franklin E. Freeman,
Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6863.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1993.
William E. Gwaltney, Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appellants Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and HAMILTON, C.J., and SPROUSE, J.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gwaltney v. McDade, No. CA-93-239-H (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Appellants' motion to supplement their informal brief
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36719, 1993 WL 503077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gwaltney-v-mcdade-ca4-1993.