Gwaltney v. . Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Gwaltney v. . Insurance Co.

47 S.E. 122, 134 N.C. 552, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 130

DecidedApril 5, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 47 S.E. 122 (Gwaltney v. . Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gwaltney v. . Insurance Co., 47 S.E. 122, 134 N.C. 552, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

For former opinion in this case and headnotes thereto, see Gwaltney v.Assurance Society, 132 N.C. 925. MONTGOMERY and WALKER, JJ., dissenting. This is a petition to rehear the former decision in this case,132 N.C. 925. The same propositions of law as now were presented and argued on the former hearing. No material point of law or fact has been shown to have been overlooked, and our opinion would be simply a reiteration, substantially, of what was written on the former hearing. Whatever difference of view there may be as to the facts the jury, in their province, have determined the truth or falsity of the averments on both sides, and we cannot disturb their finding. The *Page 401 case had been previously before this Court, 130 N.C. 629, and has been heretofore fully considered. It is now ordered

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For former opinion in this case and headnotes thereto, see Gwaltney v.Assurance Society, 132 N.C. 925. MONTGOMERY and WALKER, JJ., dissenting. This is a petition to rehear the former decision in this case,132 N.C. 925. The same propositions of law as now were presented and argued on the former hearing. No material point of law or fact has been shown to have been overlooked, and our opinion would be simply a reiteration, substantially, of what was written on the former hearing. Whatever difference of view there may be as to the facts the jury, in their province, have determined the truth or falsity of the averments on both sides, and we cannot disturb their finding. The *Page 401 case had been previously before this Court, 130 N.C. 629, and has been heretofore fully considered. It is now ordered

Petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 S.E. 122, 134 N.C. 552, 1904 N.C. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gwaltney-v-insurance-co-nc-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack