Gwaine Collins v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Gwaine Collins v. United States

73 F.3d 364, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40652, 1995 WL 761767

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 1995

Docket94-2863

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 364 (Gwaine Collins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gwaine Collins v. United States, 73 F.3d 364, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40652, 1995 WL 761767 (7th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 364
NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.

Gwaine COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-2863.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 22, 1995.

Before CUMMINGS, KANNE, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Gwaine Collins moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 alleging numerous grounds for relief including ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. The district court denied petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims without granting an evidentiary hearing and dismissed petitioner's remaining claims for waiver and procedural bars. For the reasons stated by the district court in its entry dated July 19, 1994, we AFFIRM.

*

After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that the parties could file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Cir.R. 34(f). Appellant filed a statement requesting oral argument. After reviewing this statement, the record and appellate briefs, we deny appellant's request. Accordingly, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 364
NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.

Gwaine COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-2863.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 22, 1995.

Before CUMMINGS, KANNE, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Gwaine Collins moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 alleging numerous grounds for relief including ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. The district court denied petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims without granting an evidentiary hearing and dismissed petitioner's remaining claims for waiver and procedural bars. For the reasons stated by the district court in its entry dated July 19, 1994, we AFFIRM.

*

After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that the parties could file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Cir.R. 34(f). Appellant filed a statement requesting oral argument. After reviewing this statement, the record and appellate briefs, we deny appellant's request. Accordingly, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 364, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40652, 1995 WL 761767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gwaine-collins-v-united-states-ca7-1995.