Guzzo v. Kosches

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guzzo v. Kosches

224 A.D. 741

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1928·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The only authority of defendant’s employee was to attend with the marshal and identify the goods mentioned in the writ of replevin. The alleged assault and battery committed by him was committed without the scope of his authority. (Muller v. Hillenbrand, 227 N. Y. 448; Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co., Inc., 217 App. Div. 487; Feneran v. Singer Mfg. Co., 20 id. 574; McGrath v. Michaels, 80 id. 458; Weinstein v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 121 id. 708.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The only authority of defendant’s employee was to attend with the marshal and identify the goods mentioned in the writ of replevin. The alleged assault and battery committed by him was committed without the scope of his authority. (Muller v. Hillenbrand, 227 N. Y. 448; Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co., Inc., 217 App. Div. 487; Feneran v. Singer Mfg. Co., 20 id. 574; McGrath v. Michaels, 80 id. 458; Weinstein v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 121 id. 708.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Guzzo v. Kosches, 224 A.D. 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 741 (Guzzo v. Kosches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related