Guzzo v. Kosches

224 A.D. 741

This text of 224 A.D. 741 (Guzzo v. Kosches) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guzzo v. Kosches, 224 A.D. 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The only authority of defendant’s employee was to attend with the marshal and identify the goods mentioned in the writ of replevin. The alleged assault and battery committed by him was committed without the scope of his authority. (Muller v. Hillenbrand, 227 N. Y. 448; Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co., Inc., 217 App. Div. 487; Feneran v. Singer Mfg. Co., 20 id. 574; McGrath v. Michaels, 80 id. 458; Weinstein v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 121 id. 708.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muller v. . Hillenbrand
125 N.E. 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Zucker v. Lannin Realty Co.
217 A.D. 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzzo-v-kosches-nyappdiv-1928.