Guzzi v. State

736 So. 2d 37, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 1999 WL 333226
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1999·No. No. 98-2850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, John Guzzi, entered a plea of guilty to various charges and was sentenced to a term of incarceration with[38]*38in the guidelines. After the denial by the trial court of his motion for reconsideration under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), appellant filed this appeal, He asserts that the trial court should have considered a downward departure sentence under -section 921.0016, Florida Statutes (1997), because appellant was amenable to drug rehabilitation. Being amenable to drug rehabilitation is not a basis for a downward departure under this statute.

Under section 924.06, Florida Statutes (1997), a defendant may appeal from a sentence outside the guidelines range or a sentence on the ground it is illegal. Appellant’s sentence is neither outside the guidelines nor illegal and therefore not appealable.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DELL, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guzzi v. State, 736 So. 2d 37, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 1999 WL 333226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

736 So. 2d 37 (Guzzi v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hochhauser v. State
785 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)