Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Guzzardo v. State

Guzzardo v. State

894 So. 2d 1088, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229, 2005 WL 562666
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-2630
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 So. 2d 1088 (Guzzardo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guzzardo v. State, 894 So. 2d 1088, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229, 2005 WL 562666 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this probation violation case, the State properly concedes that the trial court erred by failing to follow any of the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d) and Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), before requiring Appellant to proceed to hearing without benefit of counsel. The judgment and sentence are, therefore, reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sipple v. State
894 So. 2d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 So. 2d 1088, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3229, 2005 WL 562666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzzardo-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.