Guzov v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guzov v. State

7 A.D.3d 671, 776 N.Y.S.2d 821

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 2004

DocketClaim No. 106357

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.3d 671 (Guzov v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guzov v. State, 7 A.D.3d 671, 776 N.Y.S.2d 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the claimants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Lack, J.), dated September 25, 2003, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This claim arises out of the death of Robert Rubino, who was killed when he allegedly lost control of his vehicle after colliding with boulders alongside the road at 715 Montauk Highway in Bay Shore. His widow, Debra Guzov, individually and as administrator of his estate, filed a claim against the defendant State of New York seeking to recover damages for the decedent’s wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering. The claimants alleged that the defendant failed to maintain and repair the relevant section of Montauk Highway, a roadway under its supervision and control, as required by Highway Law § 12.

While the Court of Claims incorrectly concluded that the claimants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to partial summary judgment, the motion nevertheless was properly denied because the defendant submitted evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it owned and/or controlled the property alongside the road where the accident occurred (see generally Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395, 404 [1957]; Mongiove v Alesci, 268 [672]*672AD2d 510 [2000]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the claimants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Lack, J.), dated September 25, 2003, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This claim arises out of the death of Robert Rubino, who was killed when he allegedly lost control of his vehicle after colliding with boulders alongside the road at 715 Montauk Highway in Bay Shore. His widow, Debra Guzov, individually and as administrator of his estate, filed a claim against the defendant State of New York seeking to recover damages for the decedent’s wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering. The claimants alleged that the defendant failed to maintain and repair the relevant section of Montauk Highway, a roadway under its supervision and control, as required by Highway Law § 12.

While the Court of Claims incorrectly concluded that the claimants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to partial summary judgment, the motion nevertheless was properly denied because the defendant submitted evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it owned and/or controlled the property alongside the road where the accident occurred (see generally Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395, 404 [1957]; Mongiove v Alesci, 268 [672]*672AD2d 510 [2000]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.3d 671, 776 N.Y.S.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzov-v-state-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack