Guzman v. Vereb
271 N.E.2d 226, 28 N.Y.2d 846, 322 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1368
Opinion
Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. It cannot be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law (see Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N. Y. 71, 76). A new trial, however, is appropriate (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 176).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guzman v. Vereb, 271 N.E.2d 226, 28 N.Y.2d 846, 322 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1368 (N.Y. 1971).
271 N.E.2d 226 (Guzman v. Vereb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. Nygren
181 N.E. 52 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)