Guzman v. Vereb
271 N.E.2d 226, 28 N.Y.2d 846, 322 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1368
This text of 271 N.E.2d 226 (Guzman v. Vereb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Guzman v. Vereb, 271 N.E.2d 226, 28 N.Y.2d 846, 322 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1368 (N.Y. 1971).
Opinion
Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. It cannot be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law (see Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N. Y. 71, 76). A new trial, however, is appropriate (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 176).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nelson v. Nygren
181 N.E. 52 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 N.E.2d 226, 28 N.Y.2d 846, 322 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzman-v-vereb-ny-1971.