Guzman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Guzman v. State

422 S.W.3d 380, 2013 WL 5797669, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1282

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75668·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Guzman appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to first-degree assault. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney by not fully advising him about a plea offer. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Guzman appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to first-degree assault. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney by not fully advising him about a plea offer. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Guzman v. State, 422 S.W.3d 380, 2013 WL 5797669, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1282 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

422 S.W.3d 380 (Guzman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.