Guzman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guzman v. State

824 So. 2d 195, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8265, 2002 WL 1284795

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 4D01-1569·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges her sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code, claiming the Code violates her constitutional rights to due process and equal protection, the protection against double jeopardy, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We adhere to our previous decisions holding the Code constitutional and affirm appellant’s sentence. See Hope v. State, 805 So.2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001); accord Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001).

WARNER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges her sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code, claiming the Code violates her constitutional rights to due process and equal protection, the protection against double jeopardy, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We adhere to our previous decisions holding the Code constitutional and affirm appellant’s sentence. See Hope v. State, 805 So.2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001); accord Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001).

WARNER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Guzman v. State, 824 So. 2d 195, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8265, 2002 WL 1284795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

824 So. 2d 195 (Guzman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related