Guzman v. State
This text of 824 So. 2d 195 (Guzman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges her sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code, claiming the Code violates her constitutional rights to due process and equal protection, the protection against double jeopardy, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We adhere to our previous decisions holding the Code constitutional and affirm appellant’s sentence. See Hope v. State, 805 So.2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001); accord Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
824 So. 2d 195, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8265, 2002 WL 1284795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzman-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.