Guzman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided September 6, 2022·No. 16-246·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Clanns

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 16, 2022

* OK K K K K KK HK KK K K KK KK HK HK K KK

ZAIRA GUZMAN-AVILA, UNPUBLISHED Petitioner, No. 16-246V V. Special Master Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH Decision Based on Stipulation; Tetanus-

AND HUMAN SERVICES, Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) Vaccine; Varicella Vaccine; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Benign Cyst at Injection

Site.

* * * * * * * * * Respondent. * * *

* OK K KK K K KK HK K K K KK KK KK K OK

Edward Kraus, Kraus Law Group, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION!

On February 19, 2016, Zaira Guzman-Avila? (“Petitioner”) filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Program? alleging that she developed a benign tumor in her right upper arm after receiving the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) and Varicella vaccinations on August 22, 2013, and the influenza (“flu”) vaccination on November 14, 2013. Amended Petition at 1 (ECF No. 31).

' Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned 1s required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 1 8(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 This case was originally filed by Petitioner’s mother, but the caption was amended when Petitioner reached the age of majority.

> The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act’). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1 On August 16, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation to Petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 69). Respondent denies that the vaccines caused Petitioner’s alleged benign arm lesion or cyst or any other injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation: A lump sum of $19,115.84 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at] 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora B. Dorsey Nora B. Dorsey

Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) ZAIRA GUZMAN-AVILA, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 16-246V ) Special Master Dorsey V. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. On behalf of her daughter, Zaira Guzman-Avila, Oliva Guzman filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”).' The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the Tdap, Varicella, and influenza (“flu”) vaccines, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received Tdap and Varicella immunizations on August 22, 2013, and a flu vaccination on November 14, 2013.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the vaccines caused her to suffer from a benign arm lesion or

cyst, and that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

' Zaira Guzman-Avila was substituted as the petitioner when she reached age 18. action for damages arising out of the alleged vaccine injury.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccines caused petitioner’s alleged benign arm lesion or cyst or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $19,115.84 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in any proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner’s attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance

policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security

Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guzman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Guzman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Guzman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a