Guzman v. Crispy Catfish & Seafood, Inc.
This text of 667 So. 2d 1037 (Guzman v. Crispy Catfish & Seafood, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Guzman, Desiree; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 95CA-2161; Parish of St. Bernard, 84th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 76-165.
Granted. Relator Desiree Guzman’s application is granted. Lower courts’ rulings are reversed. Relator’s motion to strike the jury is granted. Answer to discovery is not a pleading directed to a triable issue. See La.C.C.P. art. 1733(C) and Zeller v. Jording, 624 So.2d 432, 433 (LaApp. 4th Cir.1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 So. 2d 1037, 1996 La. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guzman-v-crispy-catfish-seafood-inc-la-1996.