Guzman, Bartholomew Antonio

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 4, 2015·No. WR-75,864-03·Published

Opinion

§A'\£xi\ 9\405/{3 £\arl; 400{’{09£00\)/)/2,/ APFF/Z/_S

. 90 99@91(51?90% LWZ/ §({0/) pm\?/h /)/£2<&$ 707// ~ ..

~ .»9999 ~

Nm)£mb?_( l 305 4 1 ~ __ - couRTP:-'§=%R\M\NALA”E 1 4

, ~ . _~ `_ N(N ()4293'\5 t

-5_9£ éuzlnaLEz:thalm/_)£m% mmin " _j§`“@@%p@sia,mew '~ _ 1

' Z(Hr\)o \/JK 7536

1. __14194_99£49§9444€;§9;445_¢99@2&£949 ;M ' ___:L_MMMI 4_12 4_=5_44/ Nof_z;£; Avvo 9945_92549:_ _

l _cMMMn/>LL£;_IMJQMA 449 £»:oafi mt

_ . v f "g§[/¢L§ 444, AMJM § 990 911|;3\3(1 (g; 54`,1_\1/

' ~ _(o_mz___LA_/IBLM&Q:_M&M fo 441/145 rai¢;g;'c’ 40 4 41 _‘:\cu QLEA§E 1411 mg had 20 30 31th JU»nn% a// 644461/1/14)”¢2»:§

52/\‘\/ \/zs 412 ' _- `§ k @LML&M_;QAQM____'IFm ~_33312~_*”

.,: , - » l&uM§ ‘225\ 914 52

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI