Guyton v. State
This text of 175 S.W. 1063 (Guyton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary, the jury assessing four years confinement as the punishment.
There is neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record. There is no question raised which can be reviewed in the absence of these. However, the sentence is for four years straight. It should have followed our indeterminate sentence law. It is, therefore, necessary to reform the judgment herein, which is ordered, and as reformed will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.W. 1063, 76 Tex. Crim. 508, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guyton-v-state-texcrimapp-1915.