Guyton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guyton v. State

814 So. 2d 515, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5195, 2002 WL 662678

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 3D00-2798·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Guyton appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for numerous offenses related to the armed burglary of a business and the armed robbery of its employees. We affirm the judgments of conviction, but vacate that portion of the sentences that imposes consecutive three-year minimum mandatory terms for use of a firearm; we remand with directions to impose those same sentences to run concurrently.

Affirmed in part; sentence vacated in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Guyton appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for numerous offenses related to the armed burglary of a business and the armed robbery of its employees. We affirm the judgments of conviction, but vacate that portion of the sentences that imposes consecutive three-year minimum mandatory terms for use of a firearm; we remand with directions to impose those same sentences to run concurrently.

Affirmed in part; sentence vacated in part and remanded with directions.

Guyton v. State, 814 So. 2d 515, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5195, 2002 WL 662678 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

814 So. 2d 515 (Guyton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.