Guyton v. Guyton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Guyton v. Guyton

92 S.W.3d 104, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1863, 2002 WL 31012020

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 10, 2002

DocketNo. ED 80107

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.W.3d 104 (Guyton v. Guyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guyton v. Guyton, 92 S.W.3d 104, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1863, 2002 WL 31012020 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred F. Guyton, Jr. (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion to Set Aside Consent Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the Consent Judgment. Boillot v. Conyer, 826 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred F. Guyton, Jr. (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion to Set Aside Consent Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside the Consent Judgment. Boillot v. Conyer, 826 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.W.3d 104, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1863, 2002 WL 31012020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guyton-v-guyton-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack