Guynn v. Denver
This text of 20 P.2d 1118 (Guynn v. Denver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GUYNN was found guilty of vagrancy in police court and also on appeal to the county court. He was sentenced to jail and brings the case here for review. Following defendant's brief on application for supersedeas, counsel for the city filed a written consent that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. It amounts to a confession of error, but Guynn objects to any reversal except with instructions to dismiss the action on the ground that the evidence discloses that the is not guilty of the offense charged. Our examination of the record convinces us that this proposition presents an open question. The judgment therefore will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. *Page 389
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 P.2d 1118, 92 Colo. 388, 1933 Colo. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guynn-v-denver-colo-1933.