Guynn v. City & County of Denver

92 Colo. 388
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 3, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Guynn was found guilty of vagrancy in police court and also on appeal to the county court. He was sentenced to jail and brings tbe case here for review. Following defendant’s brief on application for supersedeas, counsel for tbe city filed a written consent that tbe judgment be reversed and tbe cause remanded for a new trial. It amounts to a confession of error, but Guynn objects to any reversal except with instructions to dismiss tbe action on tbe ground that tbe evidence discloses that be is not guilty of tbe offense charged. Our examination of the record convinces us that this proposition presents an open question. Tbe judgment therefore will be reversed and tbe cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guynn v. City & County of Denver, 92 Colo. 388 (Colo. 1933).

92 Colo. 388 (Guynn v. City & County of Denver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.