Guy v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guy v. State

196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 855 (Guy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guy v. State, 196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a claim to recover damages, inter alia, for illegal confinement and the loss of personal property, the claimant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Court of Claims (Margolis, J.), entered February 19, 1991, as limited his award to the principal sum of $660.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We disagree with the claimant’s contention that he should [856]*856have been awarded $15 instead of $5 for each of the 92 days he was illegally confined to a limited privilege program status at the Green Haven Correctional Facility.

We have reviewed the claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Fiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a claim to recover damages, inter alia, for illegal confinement and the loss of personal property, the claimant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Court of Claims (Margolis, J.), entered February 19, 1991, as limited his award to the principal sum of $660.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We disagree with the claimant’s contention that he should [856]*856have been awarded $15 instead of $5 for each of the 92 days he was illegally confined to a limited privilege program status at the Green Haven Correctional Facility.

We have reviewed the claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Fiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 855, 603 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guy-v-state-nyappdiv-1993.