Guy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Guy v. State

891 So. 2d 1193, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 883, 2005 WL 235970

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 3D04-538·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stevens Guy entered a plea of nolo con-tendere to charges of possession of heroin, possession of cocaine, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Under the plea agreement, he reserved for appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that the motion to suppress [1194] was correctly denied. See State v. Gribeiro, 513 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

We remand for correction of the judgment, which erroneously indicates that the defendant-appellant Guy entered a plea of guilty. In reality, he entered a plea of nolo contendere. The defendant need not be present for the correction of the judgment.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Stevens Guy entered a plea of nolo con-tendere to charges of possession of heroin, possession of cocaine, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Under the plea agreement, he reserved for appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that the motion to suppress [1194] was correctly denied. See State v. Gribeiro, 513 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

We remand for correction of the judgment, which erroneously indicates that the defendant-appellant Guy entered a plea of guilty. In reality, he entered a plea of nolo contendere. The defendant need not be present for the correction of the judgment.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.

Guy v. State, 891 So. 2d 1193, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 883, 2005 WL 235970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

891 So. 2d 1193 (Guy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related