Guy, Tyrik D'Angelo
This text of Guy, Tyrik D'Angelo (Guy, Tyrik D'Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-95,476-01
EX PARTE TYRIK D’ANGELO GUY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1604838-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant pleaded guilty to delivery of less than one gram of a controlled substance in
Penalty Group One. He received deferred adjudication and was sentenced to three years’ community
supervision. On adjudication, he was sentenced to sixty days’ imprisonment under Texas Penal Code
§ 12.44(a). Applicant did not file a direct appeal. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas
corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant discharged this sentence in 2021. The habeas court finds credible Applicant’s
assertion that he continues to suffer consequences arising from this conviction, including its
availability to impeach his credibility and to enhance the penalty in subsequent cases. Therefore, 2
Applicant is “confined” for purposes of Article 11.07.
Applicant claims that he was denied due process through the use of material false evidence
and that his guilty plea was involuntary. These claims relate to the discovery of misconduct by
former Houston Police Officer Gerald Goines, who was the primary officer involved in the alleged
offense. Based on the record, the habeas court finds that Applicant was denied due process by the
use of material false evidence against him and that Applicant’s guilty plea was involuntary. Ex parte
Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. Crim. App. 2022); Ex parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014). The habeas court recommends granting relief on false evidence and involuntary plea
grounds. We agree.
Relief is granted. Ex parte Chabot, 300 S.W.3d 768, 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). The
judgment in cause number 160483801010 in the 262nd District Court of Harris County is set aside.
Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any
necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: February 28, 2024 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Guy, Tyrik D'Angelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guy-tyrik-dangelo-texcrimapp-2024.