Guy & Montgomery v. Kaulman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Guy & Montgomery v. Kaulman

75 S.E. 269, 11 Ga. App. 350, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 396

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 23, 1912

Docket4076

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 269 (Guy & Montgomery v. Kaulman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guy & Montgomery v. Kaulman, 75 S.E. 269, 11 Ga. App. 350, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Service of process on one partner, with a return of non est inventus as to the others, shall authorize a judgment against the firm binding all the firm assets and the individual property of the one served. Civil Code (1910), § 3167.

2. In a suit against a partnership, where service of process was made on a partner, who appeared and defended the suit for the firm, the court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition on the ground that he was in fact not such partner. Taylor v. Felder, 3 Ga. App. 106 (59 S. E. 328).

3. The'evidence demanded the verdict as directed for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI