Guy Heide v. Marion C. Blakey

199 F. App'x 582
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 11, 2006
Docket05-2184
StatusUnpublished

This text of 199 F. App'x 582 (Guy Heide v. Marion C. Blakey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guy Heide v. Marion C. Blakey, 199 F. App'x 582 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 46110, Guy Heide, Michael Kosel, and Duane Taylor (petitioners) petition for review of a decision of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Administrator) determining that certain noise exposure maps comply with applicable federal requirements.

We conclude that the FAA Administrator’s decision is not final and thus is not a reviewable order within the meaning of section 46110. See, e.g., Village of Bensenville v. FAA, 457 F.3d 52, 68 (D.C.Cir. 2006) (order under § 46110 must “possess the quintessential feature of agency decisionmaking suitable for judicial review: finality”; to be final, agency action (1) must not be tentative or interlocutory, but represent consummation of decisionmaking process, and (2) must determine right or obligation or otherwise create some legal consequence); Gilmore v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 1125, 1132-33 (9th Cir.2006) (in defining “order” under § 46110, “finality is key”; agency decision must impose obligation, deny right, or fix some legal relationship; if order provides definitive statement of agency’s position, has direct and immediate effect on day-to-day business of party asserting wrongdoing, and envisions immediate compliance with its terms, order is sufficiently final to warrant § 46110 review), petition for cert. filed, 75 U.S.L.W. 3074 (U.S. Aug. 4, 2006) (No. 06-211); Aerosource, Inc. v. Slater, 142 F.3d 572, 578 (3d Cir.1998) (to be reviewable under § 46110, “order” need not be formal, but must be final and must impose obligation, deny right, or fix some legal relationship).

Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed. Petitioners’ motion to supplement the record is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aerosource, Inc. v. Slater
142 F.3d 572 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Gilmore v. Gonzales
435 F.3d 1125 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guy-heide-v-marion-c-blakey-ca8-2006.