Guy Ellenburg v. A. L. Shepherd, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins
This text of 406 F.2d 1331 (Guy Ellenburg v. A. L. Shepherd, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The motion to dismiss the appeal as to defendants-appellees, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins, is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed as to them.
On consideration of the appeal as to defendant-appellee, A. L. Shepherd, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
It is accordingly ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 F.2d 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guy-ellenburg-v-a-l-shepherd-kenneth-r-rollins-bobby-gene-wells-and-ca6-1969.